The big issue in 2004 was greed. Neocons voted the pocket book over the common good of our Country. They did not seem to care that Bu$h was incompetent or that he was a draft dodger, as long as the cash followed.
The Florida Fraud was in 2000 not 2004. In 2004, Bu$h lost in Ohio, there were 247,672 votes thrown out by operatives. The Bu$h margin (certified) was only 136,483 votes. Had all the votes been counted Kerry could have won Ohio. It is also true that many did not vote. In Ohio there were long lines and not enough voting machines in the poor districts. As to the popular vote Bu$h only won it by 2.5 percent, the lowest margin since Woodrow Wilson's 1916 margin of 3.2 percent. Also check out “Diebold”, they are owned by Neocons. The Diebold President even said “I will deliver Ohio to Bu$h”.
magpie
2006-02-15 21:38:53 UTC
He was appointed by Scalia, who's son works for the Bush's,Scalia should have recused himself but didn't. So much for the theory that only LIBERALS are interventionist. A non-interventionist Supreme court wouldn have let the Florida Supreme courts make the decision.
Sagus
2006-02-16 04:24:03 UTC
Because Kerry was/is a joke, plus he got the most electoral votes
Adam S
2006-02-15 21:39:38 UTC
the big hit was IRAQ war. Americans want war, they voted Bush. The media said all crap.
usmanca
2006-02-16 01:27:29 UTC
Illegal Way (Its Like Day light Clear)
katiegurl
2006-02-15 21:23:36 UTC
GOOD QUESTION! All politicians lie! He said he would help America & make it better(taxes,war,etc).Hmmmm.. ALL politicians lie. He won without my help. How about anyone else?
ku_lok
2006-02-15 21:23:36 UTC
He got the most electoral votes.
anonymous
2006-02-16 14:40:00 UTC
are you still upset about kerry losing? WHaaaaaaa poor baby.
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.