Are conservatives still working on a "final solution" for liberalism?

Question

I constantly see conservatives claim that liberalism is a mental disorder, or that liberalism needs a cure. Other rightists claim that liberalism has lead to the decline of America (I.e. poverty, crime, etc...).

Some of these conservatives have even armed themselves in an attempt to fight the perceived effects of liberalism - like the Open Carry movement in Texas, or Cliven Bundy's militia.

What is the endgame for conservatives? Have they developed a "final solution" for liberalism yet? What's their next move?

Answer 1

no

they do not cooperate they only want to conquer

which is about as anti-American as you can get

Answer 2

They don't want to "improve" their country - they want to KILL it. They're no better than bin Laden, or the lunatics that follow(ed) him. They say that they want to "remake" the country, when they really want to dismantle it - at the point of a gun, with some of them. Some people have a John Wayne complex, where problems are solved by putting bullet-holes in other people.



Conservatives have a bad habit of doubling-down on already-failed policies. It's like taking a 30-yard run at a brick wall, and expecting your teammates to do exactly the same thing, and then ignoring the unconscious bodies lying around, and taking another run at the same brick wall that laid your buddies flat. Jindal called his own party "the Party of Stupid," which was an even bigger piece of stupidity, since the proper phrase would have been "The Party of Stupidity."



The cons don't have a "next move." Like I hinted before, they can't look beyond the muzzles of their AR-15 Compensators. They can't see the example of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, where the revolutionaries turned out even worse than the Tsarists. Or the French Revolution, where the "brethren" turned out to be every bit as brutal as the monarchists were.

Answer 3

When you think about Open carry Texas and Cliven Bundy's militias as examples, you realize that, for some, their endgame knows no limits to ridding the country of liberalism. Thank goodness that there are still rational and civilized conservatives to keep their extremist ideology in check.

Answer 4

They believe what the media tells them. That Obama is raising taxes. (which he is not)



@Mr Haney; That is so true. Here, I transcribed it for you, and everyone, to use.

Do you see a pattern here?

Conservatives opposed the American Revolution.

Liberals won.

Conservatives supported slavery.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed Blacks and women voting.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed stopping child labor.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed a minimum wage.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed the 40 hour work week.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed the 8 hour work day.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed workplace safety regulation.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed unemployment compensation.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed workmen's compensation.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed compulsory education.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed Social Security.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed Medicare.

Liberals won.

Conservatives opposed the Affordable Care Act.

Liberals won.

Answer 5

Radical foaming at the mouths conservatives are clearly paranoid and delusional. I believe that they are a danger to this country, and what further proof do we need then their obstructionism and conspiracy theory style witch hunts .



The worse thing that has happened to this country, in my lifetime, was the illegal Bush election, and the failures of the Cheney Bush administration. The Republican failed leadership just since Obama has taken office is more than enough reason to vote democrat for the next fifty years.

Answer 6

All the states that are controlled by Conservatives are doing better than the ones controlled by Liberals, That is indisputable fact, To me that shows that Liberalism is bad for this country.

Answer 7

In fact liberalism is a mental disorder in desperate need of a cure. It would stop 80% of all crime and about 99.925% of mass shootings.

Answer 8

There is no need for a final solution because if you know history you know that once people wake up to Liberalism it gets widely rejected. In fact countries have had civil wars to rid themselves of Liberalism.

Answer 9

Cons AND INTELLIGENT people are looking for a cure for Liberalism !!!

Answer 10

I'm sure they'll try.

Answer 11

liberalism is fine with me if you keep your hands out of my pocket. if you want to give to the lazy and worthless go for it but leave me out of your silly pitty party

Answer 12

Although I'm not a conservative I believe the biggest problem with modern liberalism is that it has devolved into little more than childlike emotionalism applied to adult issues. A liberal picks which policies to support based on whether they make him feel "nice" or "mean" and then he declares a policy to be a moral imperative based on his emotional reaction to it. There's no consideration put into whether the cost of a program is worth the benefits provided or whether the policy ultimately benefits more people than it harms; there's just a wild lurch based on feelings. Unfortunately for liberals, governing in that fashion is not sustainable over the long haul and leads to the sort of disasters we've recently seen in Greece and Detroit. Unfortunately for the rest of us, the wheels of history turn slowly and at times, ambiguously, which means bad ideas can take a long time to prove their unworthiness -- so long in fact, that there's often someone trying the same failed idea under a new name by the time the old idea has been discredited. 1) Price controls: Limiting the prices of certain goods like gas, electricity or food seems a kind -hearted thing to do. However, lamentably, it destroys the way the market functions. If the price of a product or service is kept artificially low, it will cause the populace to use more of it than it normally would. When this happens under ordinary circumstances, suppliers spend more money to keep the product coming (They buy surplus stock, set up 2nd and 3rd shifts at their plants, etc., etc.), they raise the price to cover their higher expenses and they wet their beak a bit by taking a little extra profit. On the other hand, if they can't cover the extra expenses because of price controls, they'll still try to sell what they have available, but there is no longer an incentive to use extra resources to meet demand for the product. So, when you see price controls put in effect, prepare yourself, because as sure as night follows day, a shortage is going to eventually occur.



2) Affirmative Action: In an effort to help black Americans, liberals advocate Affirmative Action. Sadly, this has turned into a particularly detrimental policy for black Americans. First off, every black American now has a question mark over his achievements. Did he deserve them or were they given because of Affirmative Action? This is one of the biggest drivers in the grossly unfair, soft bigotry to low expectations that are all often applied to black Americans in the media. Worse yet, depending on the numbers you believe, somewhere between 60-70% of black Americans drop out of college. Affirmative Action has a lot to do with that because it "helps" black Americans get into a more rigorous college than they may be ready to handle at a young age. As Walter Williams has said,



"...(B)lack students who are being turned into failures at MIT, if they’d gone to engineering school at the University of Pennsylvania or Cornell, they’d be on the Dean’s list."

That's an awful lot of human potential being wasted in the name of Affirmative Action.



3) Rent Control: Everybody needs a place to call home; so keeping rents low seems like a benevolent idea. Also, who wouldn't want a great place to live on the cheap? However, in practice, cities with rent control are the most expensive places in America to rent. That's because housing is a for profit industry. Existing apartments that can't make a profit will close and new builders certainly aren't going to build more space if they can't make a profit on it. If you have a housing glut, it's cheap to find a place to live. If you create an artificial housing shortage via rent control, it creates more homelessness and makes an area less affordable to live in for average families.



4) The DDT Ban: DDT is a safe, incredibly effective pesticide that was used extensively here in the United States with few negative effects. Sadly, Rachel Carson's junk science book Silent Spring made a lot of wild, unsupported claims about DDT hurting birds that forever stuck in the minds of liberals. The substance was banned worldwide and even after the ban was lifted, liberal foundations, governments, and USAID have applied tremendous pressure to keep poor countries from using it. This is regrettable because DDT was and still is the cheapest and most effective way to kill mosquitoes that spread malaria. It's very difficult to estimate the numbers of people in poor nations that have died because of liberal hatred of DDT, but most estimates seem to at least put it in the tens of millions with another million or so dying each year. There are a lot of dictators whose names we curse that haven't killed as many human beings as liberals have by making sure poor people in South America and Africa can't use DDT to free themselves of the scourge of malaria.



5) The Minimum Wage/Living Wage: What could be wrong with making sure that everyone makes at least a certain minimal amount for any work he does? After all, shouldn't everyone make enough to support a family off his wages? That's a nice idea, but the problem with it is that businesses aren't charities and when you force them to pay employees more per hour than they're worth, the company is probably going to react either by cutting their work force, replacing them with machinery, technology or outsourcing, or by hiring a smaller number of higher quality workers that are worth the money. In other words, minimum wages and living wages create unemployment. A great example of how this works recently happened in D.C. A law was passed targeting Wal-Mart which would have forced the retailer to pay its workers 50% more than the minimum wage. Wal-Mart's response was to cancel the opening of six stores in the area. The liberal argument is that the thousands of people who would have voluntarily chosen to work for Wal-Mart will be better off unemployed. The conservative argument is that they should be allowed to make their own choice about whether the pay, health care, skills, and potential for advancement in the job are worth it.

Answer 13

like concentration camps? oh no.

Answer 14

Liberalism is its own final solution...its unsustainable.



•Attack American traditions, specifically Christian traditions and the traditional American family

• Portray moral rectitude and morality as irrelevant or as religious superstition and extremism while supporting radical deviant groups such as gays, PETA, NOW and abortionists.

• Repeal the 2nd Amendment.

• Repeal the 10th Amendment.

•Engage in "get-even" policies that support discrimination when it benefits historically disadvantaged groups

•Punish and/or discourage achievement through taxation and fiscal policies which promote the redistribution of wealth, growth of government and Federalism over state rights.

• Attacking basic rights of property and contract

•Use the rulings of the Judicial branch of the government as de facto law, irrevocable by anything short of Constitutional amendment or a future court ruling, thus bypassing the legislative process. Roe V. Wade is the most frequently cited example of "judicial activism". (48 million dead and counting)

•Weaken the military strength and morale of the country by vilifying the practice of armed combat and hesitating to use force when it appears necessary

•Use regulatory bodies over private enterprise to accomplish social goals and restrict competition (government, education, labor, health care, EPA)

•Establish secular and progressive social policy, including support for gay marriage, abortion, liberal drug policy, euthanasia and prostitution legalization.

•Implement a foreign policy supporting the selected protection of human rights and multiculturalism through activism, social intervention and violence (social anarchism)

• The removing of the individual as the ultimate economic, social and political unit and replacing with collectivism (Hillary Clintons Village)

•Support illegal immigration to undermine elections, produce generational dependants and promote diversity and dilution of the English language and secure a voting block to win national elections

• Create a culture of dependency through national social welfare programs resulting in a Nanny State and the subjugation of personal liberties including confiscation of guns, property, wealth and liberties in the name of social justice

• Limit individual liberty and the structure of law and order essential to it (soda ban)

• Secularize the population by attacking religion thus desensitizing moral resistance to freedom of thought

• Genocide by disintegration of political and social institutions such as marriage, the church and traditional family while supporting deviant degenerative behaviors.

• Demonize the ethics of self-reliance, courage, forbearance, resilience and self-determination criticizing individual success as excess (Blame the wealthy)

• Subjugation of our sovereign nation by treaties. (United Nations, European Union, Foreign Courts and illegal immigration)

• The deconstruction of American values through the promotion of multiculturalism and abdication of American sovereignty in favor of Globalization. (Cap and Tax, United Nations, Open Borders, Illegal Immigration and Gay Marriage)

• Restrict growth and economic development through extremist environmental activism, endless litigation and coercive actions of the EPA, USFS, BLM and DOE

• Punish competence, achievement, competition, excellence and discipline thus dumbing down the individual in an effort to claim equality (Affirmative Action, No score games)

• The expansion and control of state owned education to indoctrinate and force conformity to a liberal education system (Department of Education and teacher unions)

• The systematic indoctrination of students through an imposed oligarchy of the education system and the restriction of freedom of education to favored public institutions excluding religious and private institutions resulting in an extreme liberal bias in academics and journalism

• Destroy personal sovereignty and prevent strict limits on coercion by the state (Obamacare)

• Use the actions of lunatics and attempt to attach them to conservative opinions in an effort to gain the appearance of liberal superiority. Name calling using inappropriate terms like Fascism in an attempt to attach them to conservatives

• Create a revisionist history to justify warped political views and anti-Americanism

• Use the politics of "personal destruction", class warfare and accusations of racism and corruption to tear down any opposition

• Usurp Congressional authority by using federal regulatory agencies and executive orders to achieve their goals when they cannot get them through the legislative branch.

• Make up completely stupid stuff about conservatives that only dumb liberals would believe

• Believe that the government can tax and spend us into prosperity

• Create and environment of racial hostility labeling those that disagree with them as racists, homophobes, hillbillies, rednecks, xenophobes and trailer trash.

• Use the liberally biased press to legitimize their point of view and suffocate dissent.