India had got got great traditions, culture...then why did it lost the wars to foreiners!!!?
d_harishreddy
2006-03-10 07:04:53 UTC
India had got got great traditions, culture...then why did it lost the wars to foreiners!!!?
Seven answers:
sherasi
2006-03-10 07:11:51 UTC
Because culture and traditions do not stand against armed might. Often, peace-loving cultures are overrun by other cultures who have more aggression and few scruples. However, in the end, a deeply embedded culture can survive and even 'convert' many aggressive conquerors. India and China are both examples of cultures who have been conquered often and survived all of aggressions.
anonymous
2016-10-20 03:32:45 UTC
generally, authentic. yet, gandhiji replaced right into a freedom fighter yet lots of the cases britishers made relaxing of him. They even claimed that as long as gandhi replaced into the chief of freedom flow, british could be risk-free. They proved this suitable till the 2nd worldwide conflict. They paid for his or her sins later nonetheless.. London bombings killed hundreds in purely a fortnight. All this had a significant result on their means to maintain distant colonies like india. they had no different determination yet to drag out. Now, considering the fact that gandhiji had remained very dependable to his oppressors, they needed him to proceed ruling india so as that they could impact the functioning of this u . s . a . even whilst they sit down in britian! subsequently why gandhiji took the 1st stable steps of turning out to be N.A.M. This defused the england's destiny objectives in india. in spite of if, later governments tilted greater in direction of russia which ultimately led to destruction of indian economic device for fifty yrs. definite, you're able to make contributions this to congress occasion. If congress had maintained the comparable committment of N.A.M then we would have considered a much greater advantageous economic device. Bhagat singh consistently stated "There won't be able to be friendship between a vulnerable and a powerful guy or woman". it relatively is often slavery, he meant. regrettably, gandhi on no account found out this. in any different case, he could have have been given us freedom some time past in the early 1900s itself. His concept of non violence replaced into super yet he faltered in some situations whilst he could have incredibly been greater greater advantageous.
abc xyz
2006-03-10 07:52:56 UTC
wht traditions and culture got do with war.
ben
2006-03-10 07:10:28 UTC
tradition and culture aren't weapons that may help in winning wars....the truth is Indians were too innocent to realize that they were being exploited...
kobacker59
2006-03-10 16:13:46 UTC
I wouldn't say that to M. Ghandi! He won the big "war" indeed--and he did it peacefully! What great leadership for the rest of the world!
anonymous
2006-03-10 10:10:42 UTC
good traditions, music and culture but their weapons were not as good.
anonymous
2006-03-10 07:11:08 UTC
which war r u talking abt??????
it did got the independence frm the britishers
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.